Showing posts with label Utah. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Utah. Show all posts

Friday, October 9, 2009

Utah won't take a stand on national foreign nuke waste ban

By Judy Fahys

Salt Lake Tribune

Utah Gov. Gary Herbert objects to Utah being a disposal site for foreign radioactive waste, but he will not be throwing his support behind federal legislation to ban waste imports.

The Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah (HEAL) asked the Republican governor to write a letter last week in support of the Radioactive Import Deterrence Act, dubbed "RID," a bill co-sponsored by U.S. Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, to outlaw the importation of foreign waste nationally. Next Friday a House plans a hearing on the bill.

"He is not taking a position on the RID Act," said Herbert spokeswoman, Angie Welling. "But his position on the storage of foreign waste has been made repeatedly: He's opposed to it."

The flap over foreign waste began two years ago, after Salt Lake City-based EnergySolutions Inc. applied for a federal permit to import 20,000 tons of waste from Italy's nuclear reactor cleanups, process the waste at a company-owned plant in Tennessee and bury the remainder at a company-owned disposal site in Tooele County, about 80 miles west of Salt Lake City.

Not only is the largest foreign waste-import request the nation's ever seen, but it also has become the most controversial, triggering thousands of letters in opposition and a federal lawsuit that is on appeal.

Last year the Utah Radiation Control Board urged members of Congress and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to establish a consistent national policy on waste imports, noting "any country that has the technological capability of producing nuclear power within its borders should not seek to dispose of its waste outside them. Development of nuclear power should go hand in hand with development of disposal options."

Neither of Utah's U.S. senators is a cosponsor of the foreign waste ban. Nor is U.S. Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, a former lobbyist for the Utah waste site. Meanwhile, U.S. Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, and Matheson, a Democrat, support the move.

HEAL Director Vanessa Pierce knocked Herbert for a "nuanced position on the issue" at a time when the company has taken a multi-pronged approach to winning support for its foreign waste plans -- efforts that include a profit-sharing deal with the state that is supported by some House leaders.

"It's hard to understand how you can oppose foreign waste," said Pierce, "and yet not support a bill to ban foreign waste."

http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_13526004

Bulky waste prompts EnergySolutions to seek license updates

By Judy Fahys

The Salt Lake Tribune

Updated: 10/09/2009

EnergySolutions Inc. wants to bring in large pipes and other discards from the cleanup of an old Manhattan Project site that are contaminated with Special Nuclear Material.

And federal nuclear regulators don't see why the company shouldn't. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a formal "finding of no significant impact" for the proposal and are seeking public comment on the project through Nov. 6.

The regulators say not only is the project in line with the company's existing state and federal permits, but it also could reduce the risk of accidents and injuries by allowing fewer cross-country trips of the radiation-tainted waste. They want to clear the way for the state Division of Radiation Control to allow the shipments.

"Our analysis basically says it looks like [the latest proposal] would have no significant environmental impact," said NRC spokesman David McIntyre.

The Special Nuclear Materials, or SNM, EnergySolutions wants to take is waste from the government-owned K-25 gaseous diffusion plant, which was built to enrich uranium for atomic bombs at Oak Ridge, Tenn. The waste has its own class of rules because certain forms of the uranium and plutonium in it can, if too concentrated, cause a spontaneous nuclear explosion.

EnergySolutions originally made its request on SNM in 2006. The Salt Lake City nuclear services company needs to change its governing agreement with the NRC because the pipes and other large pieces of SNM-contaminated waste are bigger than currently allowed.

NRC engineers have been studying the request to make sure the larger packages won't put excessive amounts of SNM in too-close proximity. They also wanted to check that the special disposal practices proposed by EnergySolutions will indeed keep the water-soluble contamination from leaking off the grounds of the company's Tooele County disposal site, about 80 miles west of Salt Lake City.

Once federal regulators sign off on the proposal, state regulators also will have to review it and agree to change EnergySolutions' license before the shipments would be allowed.

A public hearing is possible in Utah, said state radiation officer John Hultquist, whose office already has seen and commented on the company's plans.

"We trust the system that develops the rules and regulations for the nuclear industry and EnergySolutions fully complies with these rules and regulations," said Mark Walker, a company spokesman. "EnergySolutions is a world leader in the processing, transportation and disposal of nuclear material and the company safely manages these materials."

The EnergySolutions site began accepting SNM waste in the 1990s, even before its state license allowed it. In 1997, regulators fined the company -- then called Envirocare of Utah -- $80,000 over the lapse. The company obtained a Radiation Control Division license soon after to dispose of the material, and state legislators passed a bill in 2004 that further raised the limits for the concentration of the SNM allowed.

http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_13527069

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

South Carolina Depleted Uranium Shipments Set For Dec.

By BROCK VERGAKIS , 10.06.09

SALT LAKE CITY -- An official with a U.S. Department of Energy site in South Carolina says shipments of nearly 15,000 drums of depleted uranium slated for disposal in Utah are set to start in December - two months later than originally estimated.

The department estimated this summer that the low-level radioactive waste should start to move this month.

The delay may give Energy Secretary Steven Chu more time to consider a request from a Utah congressman to halt the shipments.

Savannah River Site spokesman Jim Giusti said Tuesday the DOE site is preparing to pack and load the roughly 10,000 metric tons of waste. The material will be shipped to EnergySolutions' disposal facility 70 miles west of Salt Lake City via rail car.

Giusti says the shipments will likely be completed by July.

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2009/10/06/general-us-depleted-uranium_6972038.html

Sunday, August 2, 2009

Uranium Contamination Haunts Navajo Country

Published: July 26, 2009

TEEC NOS POS, Ariz. — It was one year ago that the environmental scientist showed up at Fred Slowman’s door, deep in the heart of Navajo country, and warned that it was unsafe for him to stay there.

The Slowman home, the same one-level cinderblock structure his family had lived in for nearly a half-century, was contaminated with potentially dangerous levels of uranium from the days of the cold war, when hundreds of uranium mines dotted the vast tribal land known as the Navajo Nation. The scientist advised Mr. Slowman, his wife and their two sons to move out until their home could be rebuilt.

“I was angry,” Mr. Slowman said. “I guess it was here all this time, and we never knew.”

The legacy wrought from decades of uranium mining is long and painful here on the expansive reservation. Over the years, Navajo miners extracted some four million tons of uranium ore from the ground, much of it used by the United States government to make weapons.

Many miners died from radiation-related illnesses; some, unaware of harmful health effects, hauled contaminated rocks and tailings from local mines and mills to build homes for their families.

Now, those homes are being demolished and rebuilt under a new government program that seeks to identify what are very likely dozens of uranium-contaminated structures still standing on Navajo land and to temporarily relocate people living in them until the homes can be torn down and rebuilt.

Stephen B. Etsitty, executive director of the Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency, and other tribal officials have been grappling for years with the environmental fallout from uranium mining.

“There were a lot of things people weren’t told about the plight of Navajos and uranium mining,” Mr. Etsitty said. “These legacy issues are impacting generations. At some point people are saying, ‘It’s got to end.’ ”

After a Congressional hearing in 2007, a cross-section of federal agencies committed to addressing the environmental and health impacts of uranium mining on the reservation. As part of that commitment, the federal Environmental Protection Agency and the Navajo Nation began working together to assess uranium levels in 500 structures through a five-year plan set to end in 2012.

Using old lists of potentially contaminated structures, federal and Navajo scientists have fanned out to rural reaches of the 27,000 square mile reservation — which includes swaths of Arizona, New Mexico and Utah — to measure levels of radium, a decay product of uranium that can cause lung cancer. Of 113 structures assessed so far, 27 contained radiation levels that were above normal.

“In these situations, you have contamination in somebody’s yard or in their house,” said Harry Allen, the E.P.A.’s section chief for emergency response in San Francisco who is helping lead the government’s efforts. “To us, that is somewhat urgent.”

Many structures that showed high levels of radiation were vacant; some families had already moved out after hearing stories of contamination in their homes. But eight homes still had people living in them, and the E.P.A. and Navajo officials have worked to convince residents that it would be unsafe to stay.

“People had been told they were living in contaminated structures, but nobody ever did anything about it,” said Will Duncan, an environmental scientist who has been the E.P.A.’s main representative on the reservation. “They would tell us, ‘We don’t believe you are going to follow through.’ ”

But with a budget of nearly $8 million, the E.P.A. has demolished all 27 contaminated structures and has begun building ones to replace those that had been occupied. Typically, the agency pays a Navajo contracting company to construct a log cabin or a traditional hogan in the structure’s stead, depending on the wishes of the occupants. Mr. Allen said the cost, including temporarily relocating residents, ran approximately $260,000 per dwelling and took about eight months.

The agency also offers $50,000 to those who choose not to have an old home rebuilt.

Lillie Lane, a public information officer with the Navajo Nation E.P.A. who has acted as a liaison between the federal government and tribal members, said the program held practical and symbolic importance given the history of uranium mining here.

Ms. Lane described the difficulty of watching families, particularly elders, leaving homes they had lived in for years. She told of coming upon two old miners who died before their contaminated homes could be rebuilt. “In Navajo, a home is considered sacred,” she said. “But if the foundation or the rocks are not safe, we have to do this work.”

Some families, Ms. Lane said, complained that their children were suffering from health problems and had wondered if radiation were to blame.

The E.P.A. has started sifting through records and interviewing family members to figure out whether mining companies that once operated on the reservation are liable for any damages, Mr. Allen said.

On a recent summer day, Fred and Clara Slowman proudly surveyed their new home, a one-level log cabin that sits in the quiet shadows of Black Rock Point, miles away from the bustle of Farmington, N.M., where the family has been living in a hotel.

Mr. Slowman said he suspected that waste materials from a nearby abandoned mine seeped into his house. The family plans on having a traditional Navajo medicine man bless their dwelling before they move in.

“In our traditional way, a house is like your mom,” he said. “It’s where you eat, sleep, where you’re taken care of. And when you come back from the city, you come back to your mom. It makes you feel real good.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/27/us/27navajo.html?_r=1

Groups want US to reconsider Utah uranimum mine

AssociatedPress
August 2, 2009

SALT LAKE CITY — Two environmental groups have asked federal land managers to reconsider their approval of Utah's first new uranium mine in three decades.

The Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance and Uranium Watch oppose the Daneros Mine, located about 120 miles from Natural Bridges National Monument in southeastern Utah.

The groups also want the U.S. Bureau of Land Management to stop Australia-based White Canyon Uranium from mining there until the agency's Utah director, Selma Sierra, determines whether the mine's environmental impact was sufficiently studied.

"There are a lot of issues associated with uranium mining that were not adequately assessed before the permits were issued," Liz Thomas, a lawyer for SUWA, told the Salt Lake Tribune.

She issued a nearly 50-page critique of the BLM's analysis. Besides possible harm to air and water, she said, the cumulative impacts of the Daneros Mine and other nearby uranium operations should be considered.

Sarah Fields, director of Moab-based Uranium Watch, said the project needs more thorough reviews of its potential impacts on water and air.

BLM spokeswoman Megan Crandall said her agency has agreed to review the request for a stay.

She said there is no deadline for the BLM to respond to the groups' requests, although it generally tries to provide an answer within 30 days.

"It's more important to conduct the review in as thorough a manner as possible to ensure we cover the entire breadth of issues raised," Crandall said.

The BLM issued a "finding of no significant impact" when it released its final decision on the permit in May.

Peter Batten, managing director of White Canyon, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

White Canyon in May said it would begin developing the site immediately and planned ore shipments in September.

Uranium activity in the Four Corners has eased in recent months with a decline in uranium prices from $135 per pound two years ago to about $47 a pound last month.

Information from: The Salt Lake Tribune, http://www.sltrib.com

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gXmW7umb8VO7AxzYANQRNQ9Pbe_gD99QBBV00

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Navajo Nation Approves First Tribal 'Green Jobs' Legislation

While economists bemoan the rising U.S. unemployment rate, nearing 10 percent, there's a part of the country that has long struggled with unemployment many times higher – the Navajo Nation.

The unemployment rate across the sprawling region is 44 percent right now. But on Tuesday, its leaders approved groundbreaking legislation that they hope will bring change for their people.

The Navajo Nation became the first Native American tribe to pass green jobs legislation intended to grow thousands of jobs in ways that follow the Navajo traditions of respecting the Earth. The Navajo Nation Council voted to establish a Navajo Green Economy Commission that will draw on federal, state and foundation funding to pay for green initiatives ranging from farmers’ markets to small-scale energy projects.

“This is huge,” says Wahleah Johns, Field Organizer for Black Mesa Water Coalition, part of the Navajo Green Economy Coalition, which lobbied for the legislation.

“One of the largest indigenous nations in the U.S. is paving a pathway for green jobs development in Indian country. It could be a model for most Indian nations throughout the world.”

The Navajo Green Economy Coalition hopes the initiative will alleviate the area's high unemployment rate. Many employed members of the Navajo Nation, which spans 26,000 miles – about the size of West Virginia – have to travel far to jobs off the reservation. Some 77 cents of every dollar earned on the reservation ends up being spent off of it.

“I think this legislation is really important, because we have a lot of really smart, talented people who go to college and return and can’t find a job. I was one of them,”
says Nikke Alex, a member of the coalition and a recent University of Arizona graduate.

Many of the jobs that are on the reservation are with schools, hospitals and tribal government, or in industries like coal mining, oil drilling and, until a 2005 tribal ban, uranium mining.

The legislation defines "green businesses" as businesses and industries that contribute to the economy with little or no generation of greenhouse gases and/or can counteract the negative effects of greenhouse gases.

“With this green jobs program, we hope we will support existing sustainable practices, like local organic farming that already exists but just needs a good marketing mechanism, and ranching organic meats like sheep and cattle that a lot of folk raise on Navajo reservation that could be made into gourmet foods,” Johns says.

The commission also expects to fund weavers’ co-operatives and wool mills, since shepherding and weaving wool are part of traditional Navajo culture. Energy will be a focus in the form of weatherization, energy efficiency and small-scale solar and wind projects within homes and communities.

“Our government has been relying on dirty energy and it’s time that our tribal government turns to more energy efficient and sustainable jobs,” Alex says.

Johns touted the benefits of the reservation’s sunny location – surrounded by Arizona, Utah and New Mexico, it has more than 300 days of sunlight annually – and its proximity to California, a leader in renewable energy standards that could become buyer if the Navajo Nation produces and sells solar or wind energy.

Rural electrification and rainwater harvesting are also becoming priorities for the Navajo Nation; 50% of the reservation lacks electricity and running water. The legislation will also create green jobs training programs in collaboration with Diné College and Navajo Technical College.

The legislation aligns with Native American cultural values, Johns says:

“All indigenous nations have always had a philosophy of being caretakers of Mother Earth. It’s something our people have been practicing for countless generations and it’s nothing new for our people.”

The newly established Navajo Green Economy Commission will take two years to implement the legislation, spending the first year researching the community’s job needs and applying for funds. The Commission intends to seek funding from various federal initiatives, including the newly established Clean Energy Corps, from state agencies, and from large foundations. The commission will then assess and grant funds for green projects.

The impetus for the legislation came from a grassroots coalition, formed in the spring of 2008, of individuals and the Sierra Club, 1Sky New Mexico, Grand Canyon Trust, Diné CARE, New Energy Economy and New Mexico Youth Organized.

Other Native American groups are also pursuing green opportunities. In South Dakota, two tribes are working on wind power. The Crow Creek Sioux Tribe launched the Sioux Wind company with the goal of building a wind farm on or near the tribe's reservation. The Oglala Sioux tribe approved the creation of the Oglala Sioux Tribe Renewable Energy Development Authority in May to oversee renewable wind power development on the wind-swept Pine Ridge Indian Reservation.

http://solveclimate.com/blog/20090722/navajo-nation-approves-first-tribal-green-jobs-legislation

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Decision tabled on uranium disposal [Utah]

Members of the state's Radiation Control Board have tabled for now any decision to impose a moratorium on the storage of depleted uranium at EnergySolutions' Clive facility.

The 6-4 decision to further delay giving a definitive answer on the issue came after more than three hours of presentations on the ability — or inability — to safely dispose of the Class A radioactive material at the Tooele County site.

Instead, the majority of board members want to wait until a Sept. 22 meeting with representatives from the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission, who will be in town that week for two days of public hearings.

Those hearings are designed to solicit input on, among other things, what type of site-specific restrictions could be incorporated into a new rule governing the storage of massive quantities of depleted uranium.

Such storage has largely been a non-issue over the years because no facilities have been engaged in the uranium-enrichment process for decades.

With the country's attention turned toward nuclear power as alternative to reliance on fossil fuels, two applications for large-scale facilities are pending before the commission.

That kick-started an investigation into what possible disposal restrictions could be put in place because depleted uranium has evolving properties that make it "hotter" over time.

EnergySolutions has its eye on a possible contract to dispose of depleted uranium from South Carolina's Savannah River nuclear processing center.

Now defunct, the reactors were built during the 1950s to refine materials for use in nuclear weapons.

Such a possibility galvanized the environmental watchdog group HEAL Utah to request the moratorium and kicked into motion the fact-finding mission embraced by the board the past couple of months.

Under review is if the board has the authority to enact such a moratorium, if such a move is premature given the commission's own review of the issue or if enough urgency exists to propel action now.

It was clear from both sides — among the disagreeing board members and presenters — that the issue is far from being resolved and that September's meeting with commission representatives doesn't necessarily guarantee a solution.

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,705316910,00.html

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Nuclear power isn't clean or cheap

BY NIELS S. NOKKENTVED - Idaho Statesman

Published: 07/14/09

An Eagle-based company wants to build a 1,600-megawatt nuclear power plant in Elmore County.

The U.S. Congress is considering a bill that proposes the nation build 100 new nuclear power reactors over the next 20 years.

Idaho Republican U.S. Rep. Mike Simpson has embraced nuclear power, and like others, promotes it as cheap and clean. They argue also that nuclear energy emits no greenhouse gases. But it is unclear which part of the nuclear energy cycle they're referring to. Nuclear power is neither cheap nor clean.

The two main reasons no new power plants have been built in the United States since the late 1970s are the high cost of construction and the uncertainty of the regulatory approval process. Only federal subsidies make nuclear power "cheap."

The nuclear fuel cycle starts with mining, which relies on trains, trucks and heavy equipment that run on diesel fuel. Refining the ore and turning it into nuclear fuel creates large amounts of radioactive and toxic tailings and waste. Uranium, for example, gives off radioactive radon gas, the second leading cause of lung cancer in this country.

And operating a nuclear power plant requires an outside source of electric power. Reactors emit small amounts of radiation and heat in the form of steam or hot water, and they produce waste for which we have no disposal solution.

Uranium mining and milling have a sordid history in the West. In the Southwest, Navajo homes once were built of radioactive mine tailings, and their land is riddled with more than 1,000 abandoned mines. Mining companies hired local residents to work at low wages without telling them of the health risks. When the ore played out, some companies simply walked away.

In one example, Uranium Reduction Co. began processing ore from the Moab area's rich uranium ore deposits in the 1950s. In 1962, the company sold the mill to Atlas Minerals Corp., which ran it until declaring bankruptcy in 1998. The federal government took over the site in 2001.

Today a 94-foot tall pile of radioactive and toxic mill tailings covers 130 acres and holds 12 million tons of radioactive waste - about 750 feet from the third largest river in the West, three miles from Moab, less than a mile from Arches National Park and across the mouth of Moab Wash.

The unlined pile leaks an average of 57,000 gallons per day into the Colorado River upstream of Lake Mead, which supplies drinking and irrigation water to southern California, Las Vegas and parts of Arizona. Similar piles at 38 mill sites in the West - 22 of them abandoned - hold 140 million tons of radioactive tailings.

The story doesn't end with refining the ore. Producing reactor fuel involves a process that concentrates one form, or isotope, of uranium that can sustain a nuclear reaction. The leftovers, known as "depleted uranium," remain radioactive. About 750,000 tons of depleted uranium already awaits disposal. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission recently issued warnings about disposing of large amounts of this material as "low level" waste - the current proposed practice.

Most industry supporters - who claim nuclear power produces no greenhouse gases - want to ship spent fuel from power plants, mainly in the eastern part of the country, by diesel-powered trains to a proposed waste disposal facility in Jackass Flats, Nev. - a site known as Yucca Mountain.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Niels S. Nokkentved has degrees in journalism and environmental studies and has worked as natural resource reporter for 20 years, including more than 12 years of covering nuclear waste issues at the Idaho National Laboratory.

http://www.idahostatesman.com/opinion/story/832976.html

Friday, June 5, 2009

First uranium mine in 30 years permitted in southern Utah

Australian uranium junior White Canyon Uranium announced this morning that it has been granted final approvals to mine their uranium deposits at its 100% owned Daneros Mine in southeastern Utah.

The company' s news release said, "Final mining approvals were granted by the Bureau of Land Management and the State of Utah today, 27 May 2009, just 15 months after the company’s IPO and its listing on the Australian Stock Exchange in March 2008."

Ore from the underground operation is expected to be processed at Denison’s White Mesa Uranium Mill at Blanding, 60 miles to the east. [bottom, drilling on the Daneros ore body. Credit, White Canyon Uranium]

It's expected to be one of only a few uranium mines in the world to go into production in 2009. First production is expected by September.

I expect that mining and environmental interests will be examining this closely, given the controversy over uranium exploration in the Arizona Strip, just south of the Utah border.

http://arizonageology.blogspot.com/2009/05/first-uranium-mine-in-30-years.html

Saturday, May 30, 2009

Wind-blown dust causes concern over uranium development in Paradox


Mountains, usually visible, are obscured by dust. Photo by Ben Williams

Recent dust storms from strong winds have had the communities of Norwood, Telluride and Mountain Village concerned about future contamination with radionuclides should uranium development in the Paradox valley ramp up.

Winds measuring consistently above 40 mph have mobilized large quantities of dust from the west end of San Miguel County, bringing sands all the way from Utah. Paradox valley, the proposed site for a new uranium mill, is due west of the resort communities of Telluride and Mountain Village, and the ranching town of Norwood.

The dust storms, which occurred over two days at the end of March and early May, brought thick quantities of red dust up into the mountains, obscuring the sky and reducing visibility.

“It was like being in a red fog,” said one Norwood resident. “I couldn’t even see Lone Cone [mountain].”

The dust filled the sky, covered cars and homes, and settled visibly on the slopes around Telluride. It was an eerie portent, a bloody sunset and doom-like sky.

Each spring strong winds race up Wright’s mesa, heading in from the desert. A strong differential is formed by the heat in the low-lying desert areas around Moab and the four corners, and the cool mountain air at elevation. Each year, winds roll in from the west. But this amount of dust was unusual.

“Frankly, I’m worried that once the mining and milling operations crank up in Paradox, this dust will glow in the dark!” Joked a Telluride worker. "Hey, maybe we can go night skiing!"

One resident of Norwood, a recent father, said he would leave the area before construction of the mill began, if the final permits get approved.

“I won’t expose my son to anything like that,” he said, even as property values fall under the faltering economy. "I'll just sell, and get the hell out."

Aside from containing potentially deadly alpha-emitters, the dust has a known impact on the local economy of Telluride and Mountain Village. It speeds snow melt.

As the San Juan Mountains lie at the tip of the watershed, any contaminants borne by the wind will end up in waterways and flow downstream. Ranchers who use irrigation will spray them on crops. Meanwhile, livestock will ingest them in the wind and grasses. This is akin to a secondary pulse of exposure. Exposure repeats as the particles move through the biosphere. As agricultural products are sent to market, and distributed nationally, tertiary pulses become possible.

Energy Fuels is confident it can mitigate fugitive dust. An enormous amount of water will be used to spray down drop-off and tailing sites. Keeping the areas wet will reduce dust. However, fans in area mines that vent mining shafts regularly spray out small dust particles. These mines will kick up again if the mill gets approved.

Nevertheless the perception is there: The dust seemed portentous of the region's uncertain future. In coffee shops and on street corners subdued tones and watchful eyes bespoke the common fear. What does this mean in two years if uranium development increases? Why aren't plume studies a necessary part of any application to develop radioactive resources? Do the regulations imposed by the Colorado Department of Health and the Environment address these concerns? The questions went on, but were swallowed by the wind.

http://www.examiner.com/x-12119-San-Miguel-County-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m5d29-Windblown-dust-causes-concern-over-uranium-development-in-Paradox

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Crescent Junction Site Quietly Taking the 'Pile'

Tons of tainted tailings are on the move -- finally

Uranium waste » Ceremony launches years of 30-mile trips with truckloads of uranium-processing waste

For Grand County residents who lobbied Washington for years to remove tons of tainted tailings from the banks of the Colorado River, it was a long haul.

But it paid off and now the long hauls have begun.

On Monday, onlookers watched with a mixture of delight and disbelief as a specially built crane lifted a container filled with uranium-processing waste -- the first official shipment of thousands planned for the 30-mile trip from just outside Moab to a permanent disposal site just north of Interstate 70 near Crescent Junction.

Many on hand said the heavy lifting really began almost a decade ago, when community leaders began prodding federal leaders to move the 16-million-ton pile, roughly eight times the rubble left from the World Trade Center collapse.

At Monday's ribbon-cutting, Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. said the community "went nuclear" through the years, practically haranguing any one in a position to do something about the massive pile.

"That's what it takes to get the wheels of government to move on their own," he said. "It takes people, it takes people who care, who are passionate about their communities to get things going."

Representatives of Utah's three congressional offices attended Monday's ceremony, as did officials of the U.S. Energy Department, the Utah Legislature, the Department of Environmental Quality and the contractors, EnergySolutions Inc., S&K Aerospace and Union Pacific Railroad. So did U.S. Rep. Grace Napolitano, a Democrat who represents a Southern California district whose residents are among the 30 million people who rely on Colorado River water.

"I never thought I would see the day," said former Grand County Council member Joette Langianese, one of a series of county lawmakers who dogged politicians to deal with the pile.

Local leaders had to convince Washington that the bankrupt Atlas Corp. would not be able to take care of the tailings, which threatened to slide into the Colorado River along with the toxic chemicals and hazardous heavy metals they contain. They had to persuade the Energy Department to assume responsibility for the 439-acre site.

Then they had to make the case for moving the pile, that it wouldn't remain in place during a large flood even if capped by large rocks. And, as recently as last summer, they had to prove that reviving an old rail spur on the mesa top would be a safer and cheaper way to move the pile to new digs: a 25-foot deep, 40-acre landfill at Crescent Junction.

"As a community," Langianese said, "we just did not want 'no' to be the answer."

A local steering committee even succeeded in getting cottonwood trees to screen the site and requiring brick-red heavy equipment to better blend with the area's famous red rock.

And now the $1 billion project, which got an added $108 million infusion through the recent stimulus package, will bring more jobs to the area.

"What a perfect time for our community," Langianese said.

Grand County Council member Pat Holyoak noted that the pile has been an eyesore at the gateway to Moab, across the highway from the entrance to Arches National Park. Her husband worked at the uranium mill from the year it opened in 1956 to the time it shut down in 1984. Dust would blow off the pile and into the community. And people worried about the pile sloughing into the river.

"It's a big day," she said.

"Yes, it's a big day," agreed Holyoak's daughter, Kammy Wells, director of the Moab Area Chamber of Commerce. "It's been a part of my whole life. And I'm not sad to see it go."

The Energy Department has projected the cleanup will take until 2028. But Michael Moore, the agency's acting director of environmental management, said Monday the timeline probably will be shorter, closer to the 2019 completion date set by Congress. The deciding factor, he said, is money.

"We're hoping it will be before 2022," he said.

Napolitano, now head of the House Water and Power subcommittee, told the group she began working on the problem soon after being elected 12 years ago, when a local water manager explained the importance of the Colorado River to her own community.

"It took a concerted effort of a lot of people," she said, noting that it was a "hard sell" in the beginning. "It really was a haul."

As Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, said in a letter read to the crowd by a representative: "The finish line is visible from here."

http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_12292230

Saturday, April 18, 2009

Radioactive Review: Depleted Uranium Will Be Studied

Tribune Editorial


The federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission, as part of a "long-term" comprehensive study of its radioactive waste classification system, will consider reclassifying depleted uranium as high-level waste. Meanwhile, it will develop site-specific disposal criteria to help determine which landfills can safely accept large quantities of the radioactive material -- 11 tons or more.

File that under better late than never, because EnergySolutions has already accepted 49 tons of depleted uranium at its low-level nuclear waste disposal facility at Clive in Tooele County, including more than 5,000 55-gallon drums since last October.

But a lot more depleted uranium could be on the way, as new uranium enrichment facilities ramp up to fuel a nuclear energy renaissance, and the federal Department of Energy prepares to transfer approximately 700,000 tons of the material from temporary storage sites to permanent disposal facilities. And the depleted uranium, the refuse from the process in which natural uranium is enriched to create fuel for nuclear power plants, poses unique disposal challenges.

Regular Class A, low-level waste comes and goes -- after 100 years it has decayed to the point where it is no longer considered a hazard. But depleted uranium, while relatively benign at first, keeps getting hotter and hotter for a million years as it breaks down into more radioactive and easily-dispersed elements.

For decades, depleted uranium disposal wasn't an issue because there wasn't a lot of depleted uranium to dispose of. The material was never specifically categorized when NRC classification guidelines were developed in the 1980s, and depleted uranium was treated as Class A waste by default.

But as government stockpiles grew and applications for new uranium enrichment facilities were received and the need for disposal of large amounts of depleted uranium became apparent, the NRC formally classified the material as low-level waste this year after a cursory review.

The decision stunned Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, and Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass, members of the House Energy and Environment subcommittee, which oversees the NRC. The congressmen termed the ruling "an arbitrary and capricious mischaracterization" of depleted uranium, and demanded answers. The NRC responded by announcing it would study the issue, but it has yet to set a timetable for its review, and the depleted uranium keeps pouring into Utah.

The NRC needs to stop this madness. Federal regulators need to establish a moratorium on the disposal of depleted uranium until the study is complete.

http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/ci_12166956

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Utah - Tooele Landfill Already Accepting Depleted Uranium

By Judy Fahys
The Salt Lake Tribune
04/14/2009

Significant quantities of depleted uranium are already buried in Utah, well in advance of new federal regulations aimed at determining how much of the unusual metal can be disposed of safely in one place.

The Utah Radiation Control Board heard Tuesday that 49 tons of "DU," as it's often called, has been taken to EnergySolutions Inc.'s specialized landfill in Tooele County since the site opened in 1988.

Radiation Control Division Director Dane Finerfrock told board members about the DU volumes as part of his report on recent decisions by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Federal regulators reaffirmed their decision last month to keep DU's hazard rating as "Class A," the category used for the least-dangerous low-level radioactive waste and considered suitable for "small volumes" of DU, about 1 to 11 tons. The NRC also said it would begin to craft regulations for "large volumes" of DU that need disposal in a couple of years, as new uranium enrichment plants come online.

EnergySolutions' Utah site and one in Texas are the only disposal facilities in line for an estimated 1 million tons of depleted uranium, Finerfrock told the board. Although the company has studied the technicalities of depleted uranium as part of its state license, another review will be required by the state if EnergySolutions asks to take large quantities, he added.

"All of this is in the formative stage," Finerfrock said, "and we'll have to see where it goes."

Board members discussed one reason regulating depleted uranium is so tough: Its radioactive decay products actually become more hazardous over time, peaking after 1 million years, according to the NRC. In effect, regulators are faced with determining a safe exposure far into the future.

James O'Neal, a Provo resident, encouraged the board to remain active in the NRC's future decisions on depleted uranium.

"As far as the default location for this stuff," he said, "it's right here."

The environmental group, the Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah, also has asked to make a presentation about depleted uranium at the panel's May 12 meeting.

EnergySolutions spokeswoman Jill Sigal said this week that the company has been accepting depleted uranium safely for years and complies with regulations.

Meanwhile, the company has accepted 5,408, 55-gallon drums of depleted uranium oxide since last October, according to a cleanup consortium called Savannah River Nuclear Solutions. The company also has taken depleted uranium cleanup waste from a Massachusetts factory that made uranium-tipped bullets for the Army for nearly 30 years.

http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_12142968


Sunday, April 12, 2009

Energy Fuels appoints new CFO, buys more uranium claims near Energy Queen mine

Look out, Utah!

April 08, 2009

Energy Fuels Inc (TSX: EFR) said Jeffrey L Vigil will join the group as new chief financial officer next week, replacing Gordon Phair who wants more time to pursue personal interests.

The group also announced it has acquired a block of 29 uranium claims known as the RM/Judas Group, covering approximately 520 acres, from Mesa Uranium Corp. These claims are contiguous with the Energy Queen property on the west side and immediately north of the Rattle Snake mine, a historic uranium producer.

Since acquiring the 700 acre Energy Queen mine lease in December 2006, Energy Fuels has increased the resource land position in this immediate area to over 2,700 acres.

http://www.proactiveinvestors.com/companies/news/1256/energy-fuels-appoints-new-cfo-buys-more-uranium-claims-near-energy-queen-mine-1256.html

Date Set for Uranium Waste Shipment From Moab Mill to Crescent City

This is downright scary.


It’s official – workers will begin relocating the Atlas uranium mill tailings on April 20, said Don Metzler, Department of Energy project manager for the Moab project. And new federal stimulus funding announced Tuesday could mean many more jobs will be available as soon as the end of this year, Metzler said.

DOE representatives and project contractor EnergySolutions told the Moab Tailings Committee last week that the first train will leave the tailings site north of Moab almost a full month ahead of schedule. They also assured the committee that the project will be safe and that both workers and community face very little risk from radiation exposure.

“You will know the same day that we know,” if any air quality reading seriously exceeds the limit, if any worker is exposed to danger, or if something unforeseen happens, Metzler said.

He also sought to assure MTC members that the contractors will take every precaution in dealing with any dangerous materials that may be buried in the 16 million-ton tailings pile.

“If we hit anything we can’t identify we stop work immediately,” Metzler said.

The $108 million in stimulus funding announced Tuesday could enable contractors to increase the capacity of the trains that will transport the tailings by 50 percent as soon as 2010 instead of by 2012 as originally planned, Metzler said.

In order to do that the project will not only have to buy more railroad cars and tailings containers two years ahead of schedule, it will have to start hiring more workers beginning late this year. While the number of additional workers is not clear Metzler said as many as 150 additional jobs could be created.

The Crescent Junction disposal site is almost ready to receive the material, according to Larry Brede of EnergySolutions, and work at the tailings site and on the railroad siding above the site is nearly complete. Union Pacific is installing traffic barriers at major crossings at the road to Dead Horse Point and the Mill Canyon Road. Warning signals are being installed at less busy crossings, Brede said.

Brede said 15,000 railroad ties will be installed to replace the older existing ties. That work will take about seven days, he said.

A large part of the meeting was devoted to a presentation by Metzler on how thoroughly the project is monitoring air quality at the tailings site, the disposal area, and in Moab and Spanish Valley. While there have been some readings at a few points on the site that exceed limits, those readings have been minor and short-lived, even though the pile has been “open” for five weeks, Metzler said.

Metzler assured the committee that readings from monitors set up at the property of the “most exposed individuals” have all been well below the limits. He said that the dust that rose from the site during recent windstorms did not come from the tailings pile, but from the ground around it.

Regarding employment it is not known how many of the project’s current 125 workers are local, but several committee members remarked on seeing familiar faces. Metzler said that local residents have recently been promoted to important managerial positions. New workers will be hired through the Department of Workforce Services.

For the remainder of this year, the project work will be done in four 10-hour shifts, Monday through Thursday. A train with 22 cars hauling four containers each will leave the site about 4 p.m. on those days, Metzler said. Once the project is expanded the train will grow to 34 cars hauling 136 containers. The additional workers will work three 12-hour shifts, Friday through Sunday.

An added benefit from the stimulus package, Metzler said, is that it may pay for building an overpass across the Potash Road so that motorists will not have to stop for the trucks hauling the containers from the site to the railroad siding.

The full report along with a regular posting of air quality readings can be found at www.moabtailings.org.

http://www.moabtimes.com/pages/full_story?page_label=home_top_stories_news&article-Atlas%20tailings%20relocation%20to%20begin%20April%2020-%20officials%20say-%20=&id=2233645-Atlas+tailings+relocation+to+begin+April+20-+officials+say-&widget=push&instance=home_news_1st_left&open=&

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Energy Dept. Boosts Clean up of Uranium Tailings

By JOAN LOWY, Associated Press Writer

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

The U.S. Energy Department has allocated $108 million in economic stimulus aid for removing the 16 million ton radioactive tailings pile on the Colorado River near Moab, Utah.

Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, said Tuesday the funding commitment shows that the Energy Department is trying to meet a 2019 cleanup deadline. As recently as February, the department maintained the cleanup would not be finished before 2028, he said.

The money will help remove an extra 2 million tons of tailings by 2011 — the end of the current five-year removal contract. That will be accomplished by adding more rail cars and more rail shipments from the former Atlas Mineral Corp. site near Moab to a disposal site about 30 miles away.

Shipments are set to begin in April.

The waste is part of a Cold War legacy in Moab, where rich uranium deposits were mined during the 1950s for nuclear weapons. The Atlas Minerals Corp. bought the mill in 1962. It closed in 1984 but left behind the heap of tailings on the banks of the Colorado River.

Matheson and other lawmakers worked to convince the Energy Department that the massive pile should be moved away from the river's banks, rather than capped. The final environmental impact decision adopting that action was issued in 2005.

The overall cost of the cleanup is estimated at $1 billion.

"There is overwhelming scientific evidence that this site is unstable and that the contamination already migrating under the river towards the town of Moab could, with one major flood event, be dumped into the Colorado (River)," Matheson said in a statement.

The river is a source of drinking water for 50 million people, including residents of Arizona, California and Nevada.

Despite the legacy of the Atlas tailings pile, there has been renewed interest in uranium mining and processing, driven by speculation that efforts to combat climate change will reinvigorate the nuclear power industry.

The first application since 1988 for a uranium processing facility was filed in October with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Since then, the NRC has received at least 27 applications for facilities in Wyoming, Nebraska, South Dakota, Arizona and New Mexico. Utah, Colorado and Texas have their own oversight agencies.

More than 1,100 uranium mining claims have been filed for sites within five miles of the Grand Canyon in recent years.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/03/31/state/n101516D82.DTL&type=science

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Author: Utah Paid Huge Price for Uranium

March 27th, 2009 @ 6:40pm
By John Hollenhorst

SALT LAKE CITY -- An author who crisscrossed the planet tracing the history of uranium says Utah plays a central role in the story. Utahns shared in the early benefits and paid a huge price in the end: it's a reversal of fortune documented in a new book called "Uranium."

Recreationists in southeastern Utah generally don't realize many of their roads and trails were laid down by uranium prospectors in the 1950s. "Probably no state in the country has had more of an experience with uranium than Utah," author Tom Zoellner said.

Zoellner has traced the uranium story all around the world. His book "Uranium" gives Utah a key role, for good or ill.

"This was home of the last true mineral rush in the American West, and it was infused with kind of these Utopian ideas, and kind of a strong sense of patriotism, and also a strong profit motive," he said.

He says the world has had an uncomfortable relationship with uranium ever since its power was unleashed in 1945. "In some ironic way, the earth was seeded with the means of its own destruction," Zoellner said.

And there was a dirty little secret: miners started dying from cancer. "Additionally, Utah suffered greatly from the nuclear tests at the Nevada Proving Ground, and as many as 10,000 people across five mountain states, primarily Utah, may have died early deaths of cancer because of it," Zoellner said.

The author documents an awakening interest in the potential benefit of nuclear power, but he worries that too much enriched uranium is unaccounted for and could fall into the hands of terrorists and rogue governments.

"Making an atomic bomb, once you have highly-enriched uranium, is not a terribly difficult mechanical project," Zoellner said. "We're talking about a device the size of a softball, which could take out half of a city."

He says controlling uranium will be one of the greatest challenges of this century.

By the way, Zoellner was a reporter for the Salt Lake Tribune in the 1990s. He co-authored the book that inspired the movie "Hotel Rwanda." His latest, "Uranium," is currently in bookstores.

E-mail: jhollenhorst@ksl.com

http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=5984930&autostart=y

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Ruling clears way for EnergySolutions to Store Depleted Uranium in Utah

NRC » Anti-nuclear groups say waste doesn't belong here; EnergySolutions applauds panel's decision
By Judy Fahys

The Salt Lake Tribune

Depleted uranium is not your ordinary radioactive waste.

Most hot waste gets less hazardous over time, like most of the stuff buried at EnergySolutions Inc.'s disposal site in Tooele County.

But not DU, as it's called. The uranium enrichment by-product becomes more hazardous as it decays. And that's the reason the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's latest decision on depleted uranium is causing such a controversy.

On Wednesday, the commission voted 3-to-1 to regulate DU as Class A low-level waste. And, in doing so, it made up to 1.4 million tons of DU potentially eligible to go to EnergySolutions' Utah site.

While the Salt Lake City nuclear company is applauding the decision, critics say the NRC has put industry's interests before people. And the commissioner who cast the "no" vote said DU is "a unique challenge" that deserves its own category.

Instead, the NRC ruling directs staff to suggest any extra precautions -- like a heavier radon barrier or deeper burial -- needed before DU gets buried at any disposal site.

"I'm hopeful in the end that we will come up with what a safe disposal methodology for this material would be," said Commissioner Gregory B. Jaczko, who's been pushing NRC to be clearer and more open about radioactive waste.

For EnergySolutions, the ruling clears the way for lots more of a waste stream it's already been taking on a much smaller scale. It also solves a problem for the blossoming uranium enrichment industry, which would have had no disposal options if NRC had labeled DU differently, because hotter waste is not permitted in Utah.

Said company spokesman Mark Walker: "We appreciate the NRC's ruling which is based on sound science that depleted uranium is Class A waste."

But Christopher Thomas, policy director of the Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah said DU is a radioactive threat that grows for hundreds and thousands of years.

"Ultimately, it'd be too hot for Utah to handle," he said. "The NRC is tearing a hole in the waste classification system that is supposed to protect us. Their decision puts the interests of EnergySolutions and the nuclear industry ahead of the health and safety of Utah."

Anti-nuclear groups have said DU is 40 times more radioactive than typical Class A waste and is four times more hazardous than some types of plutonium. They said it needs to be secure for thousands of years -- far longer than the 100-year hazard limit for Class A waste.

Arjun Makhijani, president of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, praised Jaczko and attacked the scientific integrity of NRC's ruling.

"The NRC seems eager to please the burgeoning uranium enrichment industry," said Makhijani, "but it has compromised sound science and public health protection of future generations."

Dane Finerfrock, director of Utah's Division of Radiation Control, noted one key factor for the state will be how long the NRC's hazard limits will apply. For instance, a certain concentration of DU might not be dangerous in 100 years or 1,000 years but might be far more hazardous in 10,000 years from now.

Whatever NRC decides, safety standards will have to be met, he said. "We'll do exactly what the rule requires us to do."

fahys@sltrib.com

{Depleted uranium (DU) is a uranium enrichment by-product. Unlike most hot waste, DU becomes more hazardous as it decays.Anti-nuclear groups have said DU is 40 times more radioactive than typical Class A waste and is four times more hazardous than some types of plutonium.}

http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_11945578